Tomasz Zebracki vs Janusz Tarczykowski
2013 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (B35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tomasz Zebracki vs Janusz Tarczykowski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tomasz Zebracki (1951)
- Black
- Janusz Tarczykowski (1992)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (B35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tomasz Zebracki (1951) and Janusz Tarczykowski (1992) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (B35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tomasz Zebracki games or Janusz Tarczykowski games? This Tomasz Zebracki vs Janusz Tarczykowski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tomasz Zebracki vs Janusz Tarczykowski?
Tomasz Zebracki vs Janusz Tarczykowski (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Tomasz Zebracki vs Janusz Tarczykowski?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (ECO B35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tomasz Zebracki vs Janusz Tarczykowski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.