Maxim Zatyrka vs Vasily Guivan
Spring Cup LCC 2011, 2011 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maxim Zatyrka vs Vasily Guivan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maxim Zatyrka (1865)
- Black
- Vasily Guivan (2168)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Spring Cup LCC 2011
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maxim Zatyrka (1865) and Vasily Guivan (2168) was played at Spring Cup LCC 2011 in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maxim Zatyrka games or Vasily Guivan games? This Maxim Zatyrka vs Vasily Guivan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maxim Zatyrka vs Vasily Guivan?
Maxim Zatyrka vs Vasily Guivan (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Vasily Guivan.
What opening was played in Maxim Zatyrka vs Vasily Guivan?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (ECO E38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maxim Zatyrka vs Vasily Guivan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.