Steve Zarwulkoff vs Thomas Dineen
FICGS__CHESS__CLASS_C__000115, 2009 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Steve Zarwulkoff vs Thomas Dineen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Steve Zarwulkoff (1712)
- Black
- Thomas Dineen (1890)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- FICGS__CHESS__CLASS_C__000115
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Steve Zarwulkoff (1712) and Thomas Dineen (1890) was played at FICGS__CHESS__CLASS_C__000115 in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (C08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Steve Zarwulkoff games or Thomas Dineen games? This Steve Zarwulkoff vs Thomas Dineen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Steve Zarwulkoff vs Thomas Dineen?
Steve Zarwulkoff vs Thomas Dineen (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Thomas Dineen.
What opening was played in Steve Zarwulkoff vs Thomas Dineen?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Open System (ECO C08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Steve Zarwulkoff vs Thomas Dineen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.