Julio Zaruski vs Facundo Dominguez
2018 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Julio Zaruski vs Facundo Dominguez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Julio Zaruski (1862)
- Black
- Facundo Dominguez (2104)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Julio Zaruski (1862) and Facundo Dominguez (2104) was played in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Julio Zaruski games or Facundo Dominguez games? This Julio Zaruski vs Facundo Dominguez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Julio Zaruski vs Facundo Dominguez?
Julio Zaruski vs Facundo Dominguez (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Facundo Dominguez.
What opening was played in Julio Zaruski vs Facundo Dominguez?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Julio Zaruski vs Facundo Dominguez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.