Anastasia Zanan vs Alexandra Obolentseva
2015 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Anastasia Zanan vs Alexandra Obolentseva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Anastasia Zanan (1868)
- Black
- Alexandra Obolentseva (2084)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Anastasia Zanan (1868) and Alexandra Obolentseva (2084) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Anastasia Zanan games or Alexandra Obolentseva games? This Anastasia Zanan vs Alexandra Obolentseva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Anastasia Zanan vs Alexandra Obolentseva?
Anastasia Zanan vs Alexandra Obolentseva (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Anastasia Zanan vs Alexandra Obolentseva?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (ECO B81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Anastasia Zanan vs Alexandra Obolentseva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.