Norbert Zambor vs Martin Neugebauer
2016 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Norbert Zambor vs Martin Neugebauer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Norbert Zambor (2304)
- Black
- Martin Neugebauer (2439)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Norbert Zambor (2304) and Martin Neugebauer (2439) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Norbert Zambor games or Martin Neugebauer games? This Norbert Zambor vs Martin Neugebauer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Norbert Zambor vs Martin Neugebauer?
Norbert Zambor vs Martin Neugebauer (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Norbert Zambor vs Martin Neugebauer?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (ECO B67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Norbert Zambor vs Martin Neugebauer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.