Luciano de Souza Zallio vs Joao Vitor Rodrigues Santos
Zonal 2.4 2022, 2022 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game (C50).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luciano de Souza Zallio vs Joao Vitor Rodrigues Santos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luciano de Souza Zallio (2137)
- Black
- Joao Vitor Rodrigues Santos (1651)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Zonal 2.4 2022
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Italian Game (C50)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luciano de Souza Zallio (2137) and Joao Vitor Rodrigues Santos (1651) was played at Zonal 2.4 2022 in 2022 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game (C50). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luciano de Souza Zallio games or Joao Vitor Rodrigues Santos games? This Luciano de Souza Zallio vs Joao Vitor Rodrigues Santos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luciano de Souza Zallio vs Joao Vitor Rodrigues Santos?
Luciano de Souza Zallio vs Joao Vitor Rodrigues Santos (2022) finished 1–0, a win for Luciano de Souza Zallio.
What opening was played in Luciano de Souza Zallio vs Joao Vitor Rodrigues Santos?
The game opened with the Italian Game (ECO C50).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luciano de Souza Zallio vs Joao Vitor Rodrigues Santos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.