Luciano de Souza Zallio vs Luciano Alves De Paula
2011 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (B44).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luciano de Souza Zallio vs Luciano Alves De Paula with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luciano de Souza Zallio (2073)
- Black
- Luciano Alves De Paula (1778)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (B44)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luciano de Souza Zallio (2073) and Luciano Alves De Paula (1778) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (B44). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luciano de Souza Zallio games or Luciano Alves De Paula games? This Luciano de Souza Zallio vs Luciano Alves De Paula encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luciano de Souza Zallio vs Luciano Alves De Paula?
Luciano de Souza Zallio vs Luciano Alves De Paula (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Luciano de Souza Zallio vs Luciano Alves De Paula?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (ECO B44).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luciano de Souza Zallio vs Luciano Alves De Paula, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.