Rustam Zakirov vs Stanislav Mikheev
2006 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System (A27).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rustam Zakirov vs Stanislav Mikheev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rustam Zakirov (2279)
- Black
- Stanislav Mikheev (2334)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System (A27)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rustam Zakirov (2279) and Stanislav Mikheev (2334) was played in 2006 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System (A27). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rustam Zakirov games or Stanislav Mikheev games? This Rustam Zakirov vs Stanislav Mikheev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rustam Zakirov vs Stanislav Mikheev?
Rustam Zakirov vs Stanislav Mikheev (2006) finished 0–1, a win for Stanislav Mikheev.
What opening was played in Rustam Zakirov vs Stanislav Mikheev?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System (ECO A27).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rustam Zakirov vs Stanislav Mikheev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.