Darius Zagorskis vs Darius Ruzele
LTU Ch, 2002 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System (D26).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Darius Zagorskis vs Darius Ruzele with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Darius Zagorskis (2469)
- Black
- Darius Ruzele (2545)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- LTU Ch
- Year
- 2002
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System (D26)
About this chess game
This chess game between Darius Zagorskis (2469) and Darius Ruzele (2545) was played at LTU Ch in 2002 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System (D26). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Darius Zagorskis games or Darius Ruzele games? This Darius Zagorskis vs Darius Ruzele encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Darius Zagorskis vs Darius Ruzele?
Darius Zagorskis vs Darius Ruzele (2002) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Darius Zagorskis vs Darius Ruzele?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System (ECO D26).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Darius Zagorskis vs Darius Ruzele, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.