John Zachariassen vs Terje Lie
World Senior 65+ 2019, 2019 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay John Zachariassen vs Terje Lie with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- John Zachariassen (1931)
- Black
- Terje Lie (1527)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- World Senior 65+ 2019
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38)
About this chess game
This chess game between John Zachariassen (1931) and Terje Lie (1527) was played at World Senior 65+ 2019 in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more John Zachariassen games or Terje Lie games? This John Zachariassen vs Terje Lie encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won John Zachariassen vs Terje Lie?
John Zachariassen vs Terje Lie (2019) finished 1–0, a win for John Zachariassen.
What opening was played in John Zachariassen vs Terje Lie?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (ECO A38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of John Zachariassen vs Terje Lie, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.