Uwe Zacharias vs Thomas Schwetlick
MVP, date unknown · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Uwe Zacharias vs Thomas Schwetlick with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Uwe Zacharias (2002)
- Black
- Thomas Schwetlick (2035)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- MVP
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Uwe Zacharias (2002) and Thomas Schwetlick (2035) was played at MVP and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Uwe Zacharias games or Thomas Schwetlick games? This Uwe Zacharias vs Thomas Schwetlick encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Uwe Zacharias vs Thomas Schwetlick?
Uwe Zacharias vs Thomas Schwetlick finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Uwe Zacharias vs Thomas Schwetlick?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (ECO E67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Uwe Zacharias vs Thomas Schwetlick, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.