Alexander Zabotin vs Mikhail Sergeevich Belyaev
2010 · Result 1–0 · Old Indian Defense: Ukrainian Variation (A54).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Zabotin vs Mikhail Sergeevich Belyaev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Zabotin (2473)
- Black
- Mikhail Sergeevich Belyaev (1997)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Old Indian Defense: Ukrainian Variation (A54)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Zabotin (2473) and Mikhail Sergeevich Belyaev (1997) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Old Indian Defense: Ukrainian Variation (A54). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Zabotin games or Mikhail Sergeevich Belyaev games? This Alexander Zabotin vs Mikhail Sergeevich Belyaev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Old Indian Defense: Ukrainian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Zabotin vs Mikhail Sergeevich Belyaev?
Alexander Zabotin vs Mikhail Sergeevich Belyaev (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Alexander Zabotin.
What opening was played in Alexander Zabotin vs Mikhail Sergeevich Belyaev?
The game opened with the Old Indian Defense: Ukrainian Variation (ECO A54).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Zabotin vs Mikhail Sergeevich Belyaev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.