Joel Zaas vs Vasyl Puzanov
MT-Esko/SF3, 2017 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joel Zaas vs Vasyl Puzanov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joel Zaas (2181)
- Black
- Vasyl Puzanov (1852)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- MT-Esko/SF3
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joel Zaas (2181) and Vasyl Puzanov (1852) was played at MT-Esko/SF3 in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joel Zaas games or Vasyl Puzanov games? This Joel Zaas vs Vasyl Puzanov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joel Zaas vs Vasyl Puzanov?
Joel Zaas vs Vasyl Puzanov (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Joel Zaas vs Vasyl Puzanov?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (ECO E58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joel Zaas vs Vasyl Puzanov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.