Lilia Yusupova vs Vladislav Kozyrev
2009 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lilia Yusupova vs Vladislav Kozyrev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lilia Yusupova (1713)
- Black
- Vladislav Kozyrev (1804)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lilia Yusupova (1713) and Vladislav Kozyrev (1804) was played in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lilia Yusupova games or Vladislav Kozyrev games? This Lilia Yusupova vs Vladislav Kozyrev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lilia Yusupova vs Vladislav Kozyrev?
Lilia Yusupova vs Vladislav Kozyrev (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Vladislav Kozyrev.
What opening was played in Lilia Yusupova vs Vladislav Kozyrev?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (ECO A16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lilia Yusupova vs Vladislav Kozyrev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.