William C. Young III vs Nicholas Hnatovsky
UKR-USA 2010, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay William C. Young III vs Nicholas Hnatovsky with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- William C. Young III (2010)
- Black
- Nicholas Hnatovsky
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- UKR-USA 2010
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32)
About this chess game
This chess game between William C. Young III (2010) and Nicholas Hnatovsky was played at UKR-USA 2010 in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more William C. Young III games or Nicholas Hnatovsky games? This William C. Young III vs Nicholas Hnatovsky encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won William C. Young III vs Nicholas Hnatovsky?
William C. Young III vs Nicholas Hnatovsky (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Nicholas Hnatovsky.
What opening was played in William C. Young III vs Nicholas Hnatovsky?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (ECO E32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of William C. Young III vs Nicholas Hnatovsky, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.