Vladimir Yarin vs Oleg Mikhailovich Karpeshov
2011 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vladimir Yarin vs Oleg Mikhailovich Karpeshov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vladimir Yarin (1829)
- Black
- Oleg Mikhailovich Karpeshov (2379)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vladimir Yarin (1829) and Oleg Mikhailovich Karpeshov (2379) was played in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vladimir Yarin games or Oleg Mikhailovich Karpeshov games? This Vladimir Yarin vs Oleg Mikhailovich Karpeshov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vladimir Yarin vs Oleg Mikhailovich Karpeshov?
Vladimir Yarin vs Oleg Mikhailovich Karpeshov (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Oleg Mikhailovich Karpeshov.
What opening was played in Vladimir Yarin vs Oleg Mikhailovich Karpeshov?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (ECO E32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vladimir Yarin vs Oleg Mikhailovich Karpeshov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.