Yun Xiao Yao vs Ze Jun Lin
Jolimark HK Open 2017, 2017 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Yun Xiao Yao vs Ze Jun Lin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Yun Xiao Yao (1357)
- Black
- Ze Jun Lin (1528)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Jolimark HK Open 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Yun Xiao Yao (1357) and Ze Jun Lin (1528) was played at Jolimark HK Open 2017 in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Yun Xiao Yao games or Ze Jun Lin games? This Yun Xiao Yao vs Ze Jun Lin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Yun Xiao Yao vs Ze Jun Lin?
Yun Xiao Yao vs Ze Jun Lin (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Yun Xiao Yao.
What opening was played in Yun Xiao Yao vs Ze Jun Lin?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (ECO E18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Yun Xiao Yao vs Ze Jun Lin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.