Jacob Wurtz vs Maren Stangeland
Politiken Cup, 2005 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation (A97).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jacob Wurtz vs Maren Stangeland with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jacob Wurtz (2025)
- Black
- Maren Stangeland (1750)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Politiken Cup
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation (A97)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jacob Wurtz (2025) and Maren Stangeland (1750) was played at Politiken Cup in 2005 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation (A97). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jacob Wurtz games or Maren Stangeland games? This Jacob Wurtz vs Maren Stangeland encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jacob Wurtz vs Maren Stangeland?
Jacob Wurtz vs Maren Stangeland (2005) finished 1–0, a win for Jacob Wurtz.
What opening was played in Jacob Wurtz vs Maren Stangeland?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation (ECO A97).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jacob Wurtz vs Maren Stangeland, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.