Jonathan Wu vs Kavin Mukhilan Sampath
CYCC U14, 2024 · Result 1–0 · Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense (C66).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jonathan Wu vs Kavin Mukhilan Sampath with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jonathan Wu (1988)
- Black
- Kavin Mukhilan Sampath (1664)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- CYCC U14
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense (C66)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jonathan Wu (1988) and Kavin Mukhilan Sampath (1664) was played at CYCC U14 in 2024 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense (C66). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jonathan Wu games or Kavin Mukhilan Sampath games? This Jonathan Wu vs Kavin Mukhilan Sampath encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jonathan Wu vs Kavin Mukhilan Sampath?
Jonathan Wu vs Kavin Mukhilan Sampath (2024) finished 1–0, a win for Jonathan Wu.
What opening was played in Jonathan Wu vs Kavin Mukhilan Sampath?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense (ECO C66).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jonathan Wu vs Kavin Mukhilan Sampath, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.