Pawel Wrzesinski-Szajner vs Kacper Jakubczyk
POL Ch U12, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pawel Wrzesinski-Szajner vs Kacper Jakubczyk with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pawel Wrzesinski-Szajner (2047)
- Black
- Kacper Jakubczyk (1771)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- POL Ch U12
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pawel Wrzesinski-Szajner (2047) and Kacper Jakubczyk (1771) was played at POL Ch U12 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pawel Wrzesinski-Szajner games or Kacper Jakubczyk games? This Pawel Wrzesinski-Szajner vs Kacper Jakubczyk encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pawel Wrzesinski-Szajner vs Kacper Jakubczyk?
Pawel Wrzesinski-Szajner vs Kacper Jakubczyk finished 0–1, a win for Kacper Jakubczyk.
What opening was played in Pawel Wrzesinski-Szajner vs Kacper Jakubczyk?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (ECO B80).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pawel Wrzesinski-Szajner vs Kacper Jakubczyk, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.