Keith D Woodcock vs Robert Asatryan
4NCL Division 3s, 2013 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Keith D Woodcock vs Robert Asatryan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Keith D Woodcock (1658)
- Black
- Robert Asatryan
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 4NCL Division 3s
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Keith D Woodcock (1658) and Robert Asatryan was played at 4NCL Division 3s in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (C13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Keith D Woodcock games or Robert Asatryan games? This Keith D Woodcock vs Robert Asatryan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Keith D Woodcock vs Robert Asatryan?
Keith D Woodcock vs Robert Asatryan (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Keith D Woodcock.
What opening was played in Keith D Woodcock vs Robert Asatryan?
The game opened with the French Defense: Classical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO C13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Keith D Woodcock vs Robert Asatryan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.