Ben A Wood vs Wilfred A. Watson
BCCA/C1/Tr51 (ENG), 2013 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ben A Wood vs Wilfred A. Watson with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ben A Wood (1754)
- Black
- Wilfred A. Watson
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- BCCA/C1/Tr51 (ENG)
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ben A Wood (1754) and Wilfred A. Watson was played at BCCA/C1/Tr51 (ENG) in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ben A Wood games or Wilfred A. Watson games? This Ben A Wood vs Wilfred A. Watson encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ben A Wood vs Wilfred A. Watson?
Ben A Wood vs Wilfred A. Watson (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Ben A Wood.
What opening was played in Ben A Wood vs Wilfred A. Watson?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (ECO B85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ben A Wood vs Wilfred A. Watson, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.