Beniamin Wojciechowski vs Nikodem Slezinski
2018 · Result 1–0 · King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Beniamin Wojciechowski vs Nikodem Slezinski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Beniamin Wojciechowski (1845)
- Black
- Nikodem Slezinski (2074)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Beniamin Wojciechowski (1845) and Nikodem Slezinski (2074) was played in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Beniamin Wojciechowski games or Nikodem Slezinski games? This Beniamin Wojciechowski vs Nikodem Slezinski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Beniamin Wojciechowski vs Nikodem Slezinski?
Beniamin Wojciechowski vs Nikodem Slezinski (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Beniamin Wojciechowski.
What opening was played in Beniamin Wojciechowski vs Nikodem Slezinski?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (ECO C34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Beniamin Wojciechowski vs Nikodem Slezinski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.