Stuart Wittenstein vs Jozef Cacko
SVK - USA 2020, 2020 · Result 1–0 · Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation (E09).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Stuart Wittenstein vs Jozef Cacko with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Stuart Wittenstein (2046)
- Black
- Jozef Cacko (1566)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- SVK - USA 2020
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation (E09)
About this chess game
This chess game between Stuart Wittenstein (2046) and Jozef Cacko (1566) was played at SVK - USA 2020 in 2020 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation (E09). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Stuart Wittenstein games or Jozef Cacko games? This Stuart Wittenstein vs Jozef Cacko encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Stuart Wittenstein vs Jozef Cacko?
Stuart Wittenstein vs Jozef Cacko (2020) finished 1–0, a win for Stuart Wittenstein.
What opening was played in Stuart Wittenstein vs Jozef Cacko?
The game opened with the Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation (ECO E09).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Stuart Wittenstein vs Jozef Cacko, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.