Andreas Wisskirchen vs Mathias Mandt
2008 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation (D69).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Andreas Wisskirchen vs Mathias Mandt with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Andreas Wisskirchen (2220)
- Black
- Mathias Mandt (2113)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation (D69)
About this chess game
This chess game between Andreas Wisskirchen (2220) and Mathias Mandt (2113) was played in 2008 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation (D69). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Andreas Wisskirchen games or Mathias Mandt games? This Andreas Wisskirchen vs Mathias Mandt encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Andreas Wisskirchen vs Mathias Mandt?
Andreas Wisskirchen vs Mathias Mandt (2008) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Andreas Wisskirchen vs Mathias Mandt?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Classical Variation (ECO D69).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Andreas Wisskirchen vs Mathias Mandt, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.