Flavio Wisniacki vs Roberto Jorge Nicolas
Mar del Plata Open, date unknown · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B60).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Flavio Wisniacki vs Roberto Jorge Nicolas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Flavio Wisniacki (2175)
- Black
- Roberto Jorge Nicolas (1650)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Mar del Plata Open
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B60)
About this chess game
This chess game between Flavio Wisniacki (2175) and Roberto Jorge Nicolas (1650) was played at Mar del Plata Open and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B60). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Flavio Wisniacki games or Roberto Jorge Nicolas games? This Flavio Wisniacki vs Roberto Jorge Nicolas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Flavio Wisniacki vs Roberto Jorge Nicolas?
Flavio Wisniacki vs Roberto Jorge Nicolas finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Flavio Wisniacki vs Roberto Jorge Nicolas?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (ECO B60).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Flavio Wisniacki vs Roberto Jorge Nicolas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.