Peter Wilschut vs Maximiliaan Kerkvliet
2015 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter Wilschut vs Maximiliaan Kerkvliet with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Wilschut (2238)
- Black
- Maximiliaan Kerkvliet (2186)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Wilschut (2238) and Maximiliaan Kerkvliet (2186) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Wilschut games or Maximiliaan Kerkvliet games? This Peter Wilschut vs Maximiliaan Kerkvliet encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Wilschut vs Maximiliaan Kerkvliet?
Peter Wilschut vs Maximiliaan Kerkvliet (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Peter Wilschut vs Maximiliaan Kerkvliet?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (ECO A14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Wilschut vs Maximiliaan Kerkvliet, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.