Thomas Williams vs Emil Malchev
GER/M/07-B (GER), 2018 · Result ½–½ · Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Thomas Williams vs Emil Malchev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Thomas Williams (1106)
- Black
- Emil Malchev (2437)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- GER/M/07-B (GER)
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78)
About this chess game
This chess game between Thomas Williams (1106) and Emil Malchev (2437) was played at GER/M/07-B (GER) in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Thomas Williams games or Emil Malchev games? This Thomas Williams vs Emil Malchev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Thomas Williams vs Emil Malchev?
Thomas Williams vs Emil Malchev (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Thomas Williams vs Emil Malchev?
The game opened with the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (ECO D78).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Thomas Williams vs Emil Malchev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.