Leighton Williams vs James Cobb
WLS Ch, 2005 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Leighton Williams vs James Cobb with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Leighton Williams (2336)
- Black
- James Cobb (2346)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WLS Ch
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Leighton Williams (2336) and James Cobb (2346) was played at WLS Ch in 2005 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Leighton Williams games or James Cobb games? This Leighton Williams vs James Cobb encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Leighton Williams vs James Cobb?
Leighton Williams vs James Cobb (2005) finished 1–0, a win for Leighton Williams.
What opening was played in Leighton Williams vs James Cobb?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (ECO D36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Leighton Williams vs James Cobb, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.