Otto Wilgenhof vs Wouter Roggeveen
Dieren NED, Open Ch 08, 2008 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Otto Wilgenhof vs Wouter Roggeveen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Otto Wilgenhof (2218)
- Black
- Wouter Roggeveen (2009)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Dieren NED, Open Ch 08
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Otto Wilgenhof (2218) and Wouter Roggeveen (2009) was played at Dieren NED, Open Ch 08 in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Otto Wilgenhof games or Wouter Roggeveen games? This Otto Wilgenhof vs Wouter Roggeveen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Otto Wilgenhof vs Wouter Roggeveen?
Otto Wilgenhof vs Wouter Roggeveen (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Otto Wilgenhof.
What opening was played in Otto Wilgenhof vs Wouter Roggeveen?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO D31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Otto Wilgenhof vs Wouter Roggeveen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.