Johann Wiessner vs Bernhard, Dr. Vonach
Bad Woerishofen Open 19th, 2003 · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Johann Wiessner vs Bernhard, Dr. Vonach with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Johann Wiessner (1845)
- Black
- Bernhard, Dr. Vonach (2050)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Bad Woerishofen Open 19th
- Year
- 2003
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Johann Wiessner (1845) and Bernhard, Dr. Vonach (2050) was played at Bad Woerishofen Open 19th in 2003 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Johann Wiessner games or Bernhard, Dr. Vonach games? This Johann Wiessner vs Bernhard, Dr. Vonach encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Johann Wiessner vs Bernhard, Dr. Vonach?
Johann Wiessner vs Bernhard, Dr. Vonach (2003) finished 0–1, a win for Bernhard, Dr. Vonach.
What opening was played in Johann Wiessner vs Bernhard, Dr. Vonach?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Johann Wiessner vs Bernhard, Dr. Vonach, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.