Wytze Wiersma vs Johan Scharft
Hoogeveen Essent Amateur, 2004 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Wytze Wiersma vs Johan Scharft with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Wytze Wiersma
- Black
- Johan Scharft (1979)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Hoogeveen Essent Amateur
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Wytze Wiersma and Johan Scharft (1979) was played at Hoogeveen Essent Amateur in 2004 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Wytze Wiersma games or Johan Scharft games? This Wytze Wiersma vs Johan Scharft encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Wytze Wiersma vs Johan Scharft?
Wytze Wiersma vs Johan Scharft (2004) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Wytze Wiersma vs Johan Scharft?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (ECO E38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Wytze Wiersma vs Johan Scharft, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.