Sascha Wiegmann vs Jan Van der Veen
Oberliga Nord W 0506, 2005 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (C57).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sascha Wiegmann vs Jan Van der Veen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sascha Wiegmann (2148)
- Black
- Jan Van der Veen (2196)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Oberliga Nord W 0506
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (C57)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sascha Wiegmann (2148) and Jan Van der Veen (2196) was played at Oberliga Nord W 0506 in 2005 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (C57). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sascha Wiegmann games or Jan Van der Veen games? This Sascha Wiegmann vs Jan Van der Veen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sascha Wiegmann vs Jan Van der Veen?
Sascha Wiegmann vs Jan Van der Veen (2005) finished 1–0, a win for Sascha Wiegmann.
What opening was played in Sascha Wiegmann vs Jan Van der Veen?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (ECO C57).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sascha Wiegmann vs Jan Van der Veen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.