Cliff Wichmann vs Jonas Lenz
29. Staufer-Open 2017, 2017 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Cliff Wichmann vs Jonas Lenz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Cliff Wichmann (2319)
- Black
- Jonas Lenz (2013)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 29. Staufer-Open 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Cliff Wichmann (2319) and Jonas Lenz (2013) was played at 29. Staufer-Open 2017 in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Cliff Wichmann games or Jonas Lenz games? This Cliff Wichmann vs Jonas Lenz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Cliff Wichmann vs Jonas Lenz?
Cliff Wichmann vs Jonas Lenz (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Cliff Wichmann vs Jonas Lenz?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (ECO D93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Cliff Wichmann vs Jonas Lenz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.