Samuel Rocha Whelan vs Rafael Ikhouane Teixeira
BRA Ch, 2004 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Winawer Variation (C15).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Samuel Rocha Whelan vs Rafael Ikhouane Teixeira with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Samuel Rocha Whelan (1398)
- Black
- Rafael Ikhouane Teixeira (1621)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- BRA Ch
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation (C15)
About this chess game
This chess game between Samuel Rocha Whelan (1398) and Rafael Ikhouane Teixeira (1621) was played at BRA Ch in 2004 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation (C15). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Samuel Rocha Whelan games or Rafael Ikhouane Teixeira games? This Samuel Rocha Whelan vs Rafael Ikhouane Teixeira encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Samuel Rocha Whelan vs Rafael Ikhouane Teixeira?
Samuel Rocha Whelan vs Rafael Ikhouane Teixeira (2004) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Samuel Rocha Whelan vs Rafael Ikhouane Teixeira?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation (ECO C15).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Samuel Rocha Whelan vs Rafael Ikhouane Teixeira, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.