Robin Westerman vs Vincent Pandelaar
Hengelo U16 Open, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robin Westerman vs Vincent Pandelaar with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robin Westerman
- Black
- Vincent Pandelaar (2065)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Hengelo U16 Open
- Opening
- Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robin Westerman and Vincent Pandelaar (2065) was played at Hengelo U16 Open and finished 0–1. The opening was the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robin Westerman games or Vincent Pandelaar games? This Robin Westerman vs Vincent Pandelaar encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robin Westerman vs Vincent Pandelaar?
Robin Westerman vs Vincent Pandelaar finished 0–1, a win for Vincent Pandelaar.
What opening was played in Robin Westerman vs Vincent Pandelaar?
The game opened with the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (ECO C28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robin Westerman vs Vincent Pandelaar, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.