Heikki M.J. Westerinen vs Laura Prins
IBM, 1970 · Result 0–1 · Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Heikki M.J. Westerinen vs Laura Prins with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Heikki M.J. Westerinen (2435)
- Black
- Laura Prins (1651)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- IBM
- Year
- 1970
- Opening
- Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Heikki M.J. Westerinen (2435) and Laura Prins (1651) was played at IBM in 1970 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Heikki M.J. Westerinen games or Laura Prins games? This Heikki M.J. Westerinen vs Laura Prins encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Heikki M.J. Westerinen vs Laura Prins?
Heikki M.J. Westerinen vs Laura Prins (1970) finished 0–1, a win for Laura Prins.
What opening was played in Heikki M.J. Westerinen vs Laura Prins?
The game opened with the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (ECO C28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Heikki M.J. Westerinen vs Laura Prins, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.