Achim Werremeyer vs Thomas Kaufhold
2007 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line (E69).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Achim Werremeyer vs Thomas Kaufhold with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Achim Werremeyer (1772)
- Black
- Thomas Kaufhold (2112)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line (E69)
About this chess game
This chess game between Achim Werremeyer (1772) and Thomas Kaufhold (2112) was played in 2007 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line (E69). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Achim Werremeyer games or Thomas Kaufhold games? This Achim Werremeyer vs Thomas Kaufhold encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Achim Werremeyer vs Thomas Kaufhold?
Achim Werremeyer vs Thomas Kaufhold (2007) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Achim Werremeyer vs Thomas Kaufhold?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line (ECO E69).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Achim Werremeyer vs Thomas Kaufhold, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.