Zbigniew Wernikiewicz vs Hans-Dieter Päßler
EU/WS/M/022, 2010 · Result ½–½ · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Zbigniew Wernikiewicz vs Hans-Dieter Päßler with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Zbigniew Wernikiewicz (2209)
- Black
- Hans-Dieter Päßler (2152)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- EU/WS/M/022
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Zbigniew Wernikiewicz (2209) and Hans-Dieter Päßler (2152) was played at EU/WS/M/022 in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Zbigniew Wernikiewicz games or Hans-Dieter Päßler games? This Zbigniew Wernikiewicz vs Hans-Dieter Päßler encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Zbigniew Wernikiewicz vs Hans-Dieter Päßler?
Zbigniew Wernikiewicz vs Hans-Dieter Päßler (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Zbigniew Wernikiewicz vs Hans-Dieter Päßler?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Zbigniew Wernikiewicz vs Hans-Dieter Päßler, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.