Philipp Wenninger vs Thomas Lutz
2013 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Double Fianchetto Attack (E64).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Philipp Wenninger vs Thomas Lutz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Philipp Wenninger (2221)
- Black
- Thomas Lutz (1933)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Double Fianchetto Attack (E64)
About this chess game
This chess game between Philipp Wenninger (2221) and Thomas Lutz (1933) was played in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Double Fianchetto Attack (E64). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Philipp Wenninger games or Thomas Lutz games? This Philipp Wenninger vs Thomas Lutz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Double Fianchetto Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Philipp Wenninger vs Thomas Lutz?
Philipp Wenninger vs Thomas Lutz (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Philipp Wenninger.
What opening was played in Philipp Wenninger vs Thomas Lutz?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Double Fianchetto Attack (ECO E64).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Philipp Wenninger vs Thomas Lutz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.