Juergen Wendland vs Manfred Rehm
Regionalliga NordS 8788, 1988 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (C05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juergen Wendland vs Manfred Rehm with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juergen Wendland (2074)
- Black
- Manfred Rehm (2115)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Regionalliga NordS 8788
- Year
- 1988
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (C05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juergen Wendland (2074) and Manfred Rehm (2115) was played at Regionalliga NordS 8788 in 1988 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (C05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juergen Wendland games or Manfred Rehm games? This Juergen Wendland vs Manfred Rehm encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juergen Wendland vs Manfred Rehm?
Juergen Wendland vs Manfred Rehm (1988) finished 1–0, a win for Juergen Wendland.
What opening was played in Juergen Wendland vs Manfred Rehm?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (ECO C05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juergen Wendland vs Manfred Rehm, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.