Lothar Wemssen vs Daniel Holzapfel
2008 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lothar Wemssen vs Daniel Holzapfel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lothar Wemssen (2033)
- Black
- Daniel Holzapfel (2275)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lothar Wemssen (2033) and Daniel Holzapfel (2275) was played in 2008 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (E18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lothar Wemssen games or Daniel Holzapfel games? This Lothar Wemssen vs Daniel Holzapfel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lothar Wemssen vs Daniel Holzapfel?
Lothar Wemssen vs Daniel Holzapfel (2008) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Lothar Wemssen vs Daniel Holzapfel?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Traditional Variation (ECO E18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lothar Wemssen vs Daniel Holzapfel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.