Peter K Wells vs David Strauss
Lloyds Bank Open, 1984 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter K Wells vs David Strauss with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter K Wells (2320)
- Black
- David Strauss (2410)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Lloyds Bank Open
- Year
- 1984
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter K Wells (2320) and David Strauss (2410) was played at Lloyds Bank Open in 1984 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter K Wells games or David Strauss games? This Peter K Wells vs David Strauss encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter K Wells vs David Strauss?
Peter K Wells vs David Strauss (1984) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Peter K Wells vs David Strauss?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter K Wells vs David Strauss, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.