Peter K Wells vs Keith C Arkell
GBR Ch 100th, 2013 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System, Rubinstein Variation (E42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter K Wells vs Keith C Arkell with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter K Wells (2482)
- Black
- Keith C Arkell (2444)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- GBR Ch 100th
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System, Rubinstein Variation (E42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter K Wells (2482) and Keith C Arkell (2444) was played at GBR Ch 100th in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System, Rubinstein Variation (E42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter K Wells games or Keith C Arkell games? This Peter K Wells vs Keith C Arkell encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System, Rubinstein Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter K Wells vs Keith C Arkell?
Peter K Wells vs Keith C Arkell (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Keith C Arkell.
What opening was played in Peter K Wells vs Keith C Arkell?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System, Rubinstein Variation (ECO E42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter K Wells vs Keith C Arkell, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.