Robert Weiser vs Bronius I Rimkus
WS/CCM/A/26, 2022 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense (E52).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robert Weiser vs Bronius I Rimkus with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robert Weiser (2251)
- Black
- Bronius I Rimkus (2255)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- WS/CCM/A/26
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense (E52)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robert Weiser (2251) and Bronius I Rimkus (2255) was played at WS/CCM/A/26 in 2022 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense (E52). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robert Weiser games or Bronius I Rimkus games? This Robert Weiser vs Bronius I Rimkus encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robert Weiser vs Bronius I Rimkus?
Robert Weiser vs Bronius I Rimkus (2022) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Robert Weiser vs Bronius I Rimkus?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense (ECO E52).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robert Weiser vs Bronius I Rimkus, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.