Maximilian Weimann vs Michael, Dr. Axmann
2010 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maximilian Weimann vs Michael, Dr. Axmann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maximilian Weimann (2188)
- Black
- Michael, Dr. Axmann (1984)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maximilian Weimann (2188) and Michael, Dr. Axmann (1984) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maximilian Weimann games or Michael, Dr. Axmann games? This Maximilian Weimann vs Michael, Dr. Axmann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maximilian Weimann vs Michael, Dr. Axmann?
Maximilian Weimann vs Michael, Dr. Axmann (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Maximilian Weimann vs Michael, Dr. Axmann?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maximilian Weimann vs Michael, Dr. Axmann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.