Max Weidenhoefer vs Jacob von Estorff
Lueneburg Open A 2019, 2019 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Exchange Variation (E79).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Max Weidenhoefer vs Jacob von Estorff with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Max Weidenhoefer (1714)
- Black
- Jacob von Estorff (2055)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Lueneburg Open A 2019
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Exchange Variation (E79)
About this chess game
This chess game between Max Weidenhoefer (1714) and Jacob von Estorff (2055) was played at Lueneburg Open A 2019 in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Exchange Variation (E79). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Max Weidenhoefer games or Jacob von Estorff games? This Max Weidenhoefer vs Jacob von Estorff encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Max Weidenhoefer vs Jacob von Estorff?
Max Weidenhoefer vs Jacob von Estorff (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Jacob von Estorff.
What opening was played in Max Weidenhoefer vs Jacob von Estorff?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Exchange Variation (ECO E79).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Max Weidenhoefer vs Jacob von Estorff, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.