Bertrand W Weegenaar vs Jeroen J W Van Gool
NED/KE14/final (NED), 2014 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25).
Analyze this game
Open Bertrand W Weegenaar vs Jeroen J W Van Gool on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bertrand W Weegenaar (2218)
- Black
- Jeroen J W Van Gool (2116)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- NED/KE14/final (NED)
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bertrand W Weegenaar (2218) and Jeroen J W Van Gool (2116) was played at NED/KE14/final (NED) in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bertrand W Weegenaar games or Jeroen J W Van Gool games? This Bertrand W Weegenaar vs Jeroen J W Van Gool encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bertrand W Weegenaar vs Jeroen J W Van Gool?
Bertrand W Weegenaar vs Jeroen J W Van Gool (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Bertrand W Weegenaar.
What opening was played in Bertrand W Weegenaar vs Jeroen J W Van Gool?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (ECO A25).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bertrand W Weegenaar vs Jeroen J W Van Gool, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.