Gary Wastell vs Gregory J Canfell
Sydney Open, date unknown · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line (E69).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gary Wastell vs Gregory J Canfell with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gary Wastell
- Black
- Gregory J Canfell (2315)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Sydney Open
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line (E69)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gary Wastell and Gregory J Canfell (2315) was played at Sydney Open and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line (E69). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gary Wastell games or Gregory J Canfell games? This Gary Wastell vs Gregory J Canfell encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gary Wastell vs Gregory J Canfell?
Gary Wastell vs Gregory J Canfell finished 0–1, a win for Gregory J Canfell.
What opening was played in Gary Wastell vs Gregory J Canfell?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line (ECO E69).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gary Wastell vs Gregory J Canfell, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.